phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

COA finally provides guidance for grandparenting time appeals

Posted on Tuesday, May 15, 2018

It took a nudge from the Michigan Supreme Court, but the Court of Appeals released a published opinion in Varran v Granneman, issued October 13, 2015 (Docket 321866; 322437), concluding that the father had an appeal by right from the trial court's order awarding grandparenting time, over the father's objection.  Under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii), a post judgment order affecting custody is appealable by right.  The Court of Appeals reasoned that a parent would have an appeal by right as an order "affecting custody" because the award of grandparenting time  "overrides a parent's legal decision to deny grandparenting time,  a grandparenting time order interferes with the parent's fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of his or her child." The Court identified the material distinction between the  court rule's use of the term "affecting" custody, but not requiring  a "change" in custody.

 

By this decision, the Court of Appeals did not address an appeal by grandparents who are denied grandparenting time.  Presumably, consistent with this decision and the court rule, when a grandparent is denied grandparenting time, the question of whether there is an appeal by right or by leave is a bifurcated issue. If the grandparents filed an original action, as the statute permits, and the trial court denies grandparenting time, then presumably the grandparents would have an appeal by right under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(i), because the order would be the "first judgment or order that disposes of all the claims and adjudicates the rights and liabilities of all the parties."  But if the grandparents filed a motion in an existing case (such as the divorce file), then a denial of grandparenting time would only be appealable by application to the Court of Appeals because that order does not qualify under either MCR 7.202(6)(a)(i) [first order rule] or (iii) [post judgment order affecting custody].

 

The Court of Appeals' decision also addresses a host of other interesting issues related to grandparenting time orders (constitutionality of statute, subject matter jurisdiction, requirement that parent deny grandparenting time, expert testimony, substantial risk of harm). It is worth a read if you are working on any grandparenting time case.

Recent
Posts

Michigan Supreme Court: Assets In “Solely For The Benefit” Trust Not Necessarily Countable For Medicaid Eligibility
May 15, 2019
The fact that a “Solely for the Benefit” (SBO) trust (1) includes f...
Probate Court Didn’t Use Proper Legal Standard When Appointing Guardian
May 8, 2019
Unless the Probate Court finds that an elderly woman’s son cannot p...
Unambiguous Contracts Prevail Over Spousal Support Guidelines
May 1, 2019
Thirty-seven years after parties were divorced, Oakland Circuit Cou...
Child Custody Act Misinterpreted, Father’s Change Of Domicile Motion Wrongly Denied
Apr 24, 2019
In this custody/change of domicile appeal, the trial court committe...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required