phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

#
Posted: Mar 13, 2019, 10:55 AM
The Michigan Supreme Court has vacated a Court of Appeals decision that terminated an unknown biological father’s parental rights, instructing the appellate court to remand the case to the trial court for further determinations.
Read More
#
Posted: Mar 11, 2019, 1:05 PM
Writing for a unanimous court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the United States Supreme Court ruled that the 8th Amendment’s protection from excessive fines is incorporated under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and thus applies to state and local actors. Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. ___ (2019).
Read More
#
Posted: Mar 6, 2019, 12:25 PM
A trial court erred by exercising jurisdiction over a juvenile under MCL 712A.2(b) and, therefore, the order terminating the respondent-father’s parental rights to the child had to be vacated, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Feb 27, 2019, 1:45 PM
In this case involving no-fault insurance benefits, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the stipulated order from which the plaintiff appealed did not qualify as a “final order” and, therefore, the Court did not have jurisdiction over the matter.
Read More
#
Posted: Feb 25, 2019, 11:15 AM
Under the precedent set in Spohn v Van Dyke Public Schools 296 Mich App 470 (2012), the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that because of a failure to disclose a possible personal injury claim in a pending bankruptcy action, the Wayne County Circuit Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary disposition. McDonald v. Yeldon, Unp. Per Curiam Op. of COA issued 01/03/2019 (Docket No. 339309).
Read More
#
Posted: Feb 20, 2019, 9:00 AM
An affidavit of merit submitted by a board-certified cardiologist satisfied the medical-malpractice expert witness requirements in MCL 600.2912d and MCL 600.2169, even though the doctor’s specialty was not interventional cardiology, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Feb 12, 2019, 2:20 PM
A trial court wrongly dismissed this auto negligence action, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled, because there was a genuine issue of material fact about whether the 3-year-old boy’s fractured clavicle affected his “ability to lead his normal life” under the threshold injury standard set forth in McCormick v Carrier, 487 Mich 180 (2010).
Read More
#
Posted: Feb 7, 2019, 2:50 PM
A guardianship and conservatorship petition filed by the adult children of a protected individual should not have been disqualified based on sheer speculation that they were “too young” and might be “pushed, and prodded, and pulled” by other family members, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Jan 30, 2019, 2:20 PM
The evidence in a custody action demonstrated that a change in circumstances had occurred and, therefore, the trial court wrongly denied a mother’s motion to modify a custody order, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled, instructing the trial court to analyze the best interest factors on remand.
Read More
#
Posted: Jan 23, 2019, 10:50 AM
Attorneys who are retained to provide expert witness testimony are not automatically shielded by the witness immunity doctrine and can be sued for professional malpractice, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled for the first time.
Read More
#
Posted: Jan 18, 2019, 1:05 PM
Even though a temporary detention order did not include a “contrary to the welfare” finding, as required by law, this did not preclude the plaintiff’s eligibility for Title IV-E foster-care funding because the temporary detention order was not an order removing the plaintiff from his home and “into foster care,” the Michigan Court of Appeals has unanimously ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Jan 15, 2019, 10:50 AM
The No-Fault Act’s one-year-back rule, MCL 500.3145, bars a medical provider’s efforts to collect on a patient-insured’s “balance bill” when the action to collect the balance is untimely filed – or, as in this case, not filed at all, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Dec 26, 2018, 2:15 PM
A criminal defendant’s failure to satisfy the plain-error test regarding a trial court’s alleged error does not, by itself, prohibit the defendant from bringing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim related to that same error, according to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Read More
#
Posted: Dec 19, 2018, 2:40 PM
Earnings from the defendant-husband’s medical marijuana grow operation were correctly included in the parties’ marital estate during their divorce proceedings, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Dec 13, 2018, 9:25 AM
A plea agreement reached by a former Michigan senator was contrary to public policy because it prohibited the senator from seeking public office during his five-year probationary period, according to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Read More
#
Posted: Dec 5, 2018, 3:00 PM
A Michigan lawyer was not automatically prohibited by the attorney ethics rules from being named as a beneficiary in a will and trust that he prepared for his client, who was also a good friend, according to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Read More
#
Posted: Nov 28, 2018, 11:45 AM
A father remained responsible for more than $40,000 in unpaid child support from a 1992 paternity case because the 10-year statute of limitations for enforcing child-support orders was tolled by the trial court’s continuing jurisdiction, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Nov 20, 2018, 2:40 PM
The plaintiffs who prevailed in a Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA) lawsuit could recover post-judgment attorney fees under MCL 15.364, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled in a published opinion.
Read More
#
Posted: Nov 14, 2018, 3:00 PM
The owners of three dogs killed by Detroit police during a marijuana raid can sue the officers who shot the dogs for civil rights violations under 42 USC §1983, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
Read More
#
Posted: Nov 7, 2018, 10:35 AM
A former Michigan lawmaker charged with perjury is not entitled to legislative immunity or evidentiary privilege under the Michigan Constitution, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled. In People v Courser (Docket No. 341817), former state Representative Todd Courser was charged with perjury. The charges stemmed from testimony Courser gave to a House Select Committee that was examining allegations that he had committed misconduct in office.
Read More

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required

Archived
Posts

Tags