phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

Appellate Attorneys Get Pass From Court of Appeals

Posted on Wednesday, May 16, 2018

The Court of Appeals held that an attorney could not be sued for legal malpractice, even if the attorney missed the deadline for filing a Claim of Appeal.  The Court of Appeals in MacDowell v Houghtaling, unpublished per curiam opinion, issued August 23, 2016 (Docket No. 328902), reasoned that the plaintiff could not establish the element of proximate cause based on the Court of Appeals' prior denial on a delayed application "for lack of merits in the grounds presented."  In reaching this holding, the Court is giving attorneys who commit legal malpractice a free pass - so long as they file a delayed application. The malpracticing attorney could even intentionally tank the case in the application and the leave denied order would forever insulate the attorney from liability.

 

The Court of Appeals reached this holding even though:

 

  •  85% of all applications are denied.
  • The Court of Appeals employs standard language for leave denied "on the merits" of the grounds presented in all denials except those that arise from interlocutory appeals.
  • Applicant undergo a different review process than appeals by right.
  • Oral Argument is not permitted on Application, thus denying the attorney an opportunity to advocate for the case.
  • The Court of Appeals does not have the trial court record when it decides an application, relying only on documents supplied by the Appellant.
  • Applications are decided by 3 judges from single district while Appeals by right are decided by a random draw of 3 out of 27 judges of the Court.

 

 

Stay tuned to see if this case sparks the interest of the Michigan Supreme Court.

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!

Recent
Posts

Mediator’s Failure To Inquire About Domestic Violence Did Not Negate Divorce Settlement
Feb 19, 2020
A settlement agreement signed by the parties in this divorce action...
Fees In Divorce Case Properly Denied: Not Pursued Within “Reasonable Time”
Feb 12, 2020
The plaintiff and the defendant divorced in 2013. Pursuant to a con...
Trial Court Correctly Granted Minor’s Petition To Change His Name
Feb 5, 2020
A 14-year-old’s petition to change his surname was properly granted...
MSC: Trial Court Must Consider Guardianship For Children Under Age 10
Jan 29, 2020
A trial court must examine whether terminating a mother’s parental ...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required