COA Holds That Homeless Man Does Not Violate SORA | Speaker Law
phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

COA Holds That Homeless Man Does Not Violate SORA

Posted on Monday, May 14, 2018

In People v Dowdy, the Court of Appeals issued a published opinion interpreting SORA -- the Sex Offender Registry Act. A homeless man was prosecuted for not complying with SORA's requirements that a sex offender "report his or her new residence or domicile within 10 days after the individual changes or vacates his or her new residence [or] domicile..." MCL 28.725.

 

The Court of Appeals examined the statutory and dictionary definitions of "residence" and concluded that "the provisional location where a homeless person happens to spend the night does not fall within the ambit of these definitions. A homeless person is not provided an accommodation by another as a place to habitually sleep or store personal items." Indeed, the COA noted that the "concepts of habitually and regularity are antithetical to the circumstances of homelessness."

 

The COA affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the charges against the homeless defendant, and invited the Legislature to include a provision in SORA to address the reporting requirements for the homeless.

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!

Recent
Posts

Appeals Court Denies Father’s Constitutional Challenge To Guardianship Statute
Oct 28, 2020
The Michigan Court of Appeals has upheld a probate court order gran...
Educational Neglect: Trial Court Correctly Assumed Jurisdiction Over Children
Oct 13, 2020
The Kalamazoo Circuit Court properly assumed jurisdiction over the ...
Trial Court Wrongly Imputed Overtime Income When Modifying Child Support
Oct 7, 2020
In this child-support modification case, the trial court erroneousl...
Trial Court Interfered With Parent’s Right To Question Guardian Ad Litem About Report
Sep 30, 2020
In this parenting-time dispute, the trial court improperly 1) treat...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required