Michigan Supreme Court Holds that Summary Disposition Was Improper Where Plaintiff Suffered Injuries While Unloading Personal Items from his Truck | Speaker Law
phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

Michigan Supreme Court Holds that Summary Disposition Was Improper Where Plaintiff Suffered Injuries While Unloading Personal Items from his Truck

Posted on Thursday, May 17, 2018

On June 15, 2017, the Michigan Supreme Court decided Kemp v Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Michigan (Docket No. 151719), a case concerning a plaintiff’s claim for personal injury benefits when he was injured while unloading items from his vehicle. The Supreme Court first addressed whether the plaintiff satisfied the parked vehicle exception for lowering property from the vehicle, MCL 500.3106(1)(b). The Court found that the plaintiff was lowering property from his vehicle, and there was a question of fact as to whether he was injured as a “direct result” of that process. It was for the jury to decide whether the plaintiff’s property was “of sufficient size and weight to cause plaintiff’s injury.” Id., slip op. at 9. 

Next, the Supreme Court considered whether the plaintiff had satisfied the transportational function requirement. The Supreme Court held that conveyance of one’s personal belongings is closely related to the transportational function of a motor vehicle and overruled the Court of Appeals decision in Shellenberger v Ins Co of North America to the contrary. The plaintiff had satisfied the test as a matter of law.

Finally, the Court held that because the plaintiff had created a question of fact as to whether his injury was the direct result of lowering property from his vehicle, the plaintiff had also created a question of fact as to whether the causal relationship between his use of the motor vehicle as a motor vehicle and his injury was more than incidental, fortuitous, or but-for. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and remanded for further proceedings.

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!

Recent
Posts

Interest In Well-Being Of Adult Child ‘Sufficient’ To Not Void Mom’s Auto Policy
Jun 3, 2020
An automobile liability policy should not be voided on public polic...
Trial Court Erroneously Ordered Child’s Surname Be Changed
May 27, 2020
A trial court improperly held that the surname of a child born out ...
MSC: Consent Divorce Judgment Preempted By Federal Law
May 20, 2020
A consent judgment of divorce under which the parties agreed that t...
Surviving Spouse Was Not ‘Willfully Absent’ During Divorce Proceedings
May 13, 2020
The defendant, Anne Jones-Von Greiff, was married to the decedent, ...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required