Offer of Judgment Rule | Speaker Law
phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law

Offer of Judgment Rule

Posted on Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Although the Michigan Supreme Court rarely addresses the offer of judgment rule, MCR 2.405 (I could only find one previous case--Freeman v Consumers Power Co., 437 Mich 514, 473 NW2d 63 (1991)), the Court issued an opinion this week regarding the interplay of offers of judgment in equity actions in Knue v Smith. In this quiet title action, a party made an offer of judgment of $3,000 in exchange for a quitclaim deed. The Court held, in a highly divided decision, that the offer was not an offer to stipulate to "the entry of a judgment in a sum certain" as required by MCR 2.405. The decision has important implications for attorneys in real property disputes, which typically involve equity issues.

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!


Law Firm May Collect Unpaid Fees Based On Contract Provision
Nov 23, 2021
A trial court properly awarded the plaintiff-attorney more than $78...
Appeals Court Strikes Down Parts Of Michigan’s Ballot Drive Law
Nov 17, 2021
The Michigan Court of Appeals has declared unconstitutional several...
Statute Authorizing Imposition Of Court Costs Is Constitutional
Nov 10, 2021
The defendant did not demonstrate that MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(iii) – the ...
Plaintiff’s Fraud Did Not Necessitate ROPA Judgment Being Vacated
Nov 3, 2021
The trial court in this disputed parentage case properly held that,...



Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required