Several Speaker Law Firm Appeals Made the Michigan Lawyers Weekly “Most Important Decisions for January – June 2017” | Speaker Law
phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

Several Speaker Law Firm Appeals Made the Michigan Lawyers Weekly “Most Important Decisions for January – June 2017”

Posted on Thursday, May 17, 2018

From the Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017:
Family Law

Reliance on FOC findings is prohibited

               The court, itself, must find that there is adequate evidence to support a determination of whether proper cause or a sufficient change in circumstances exists to warrant an investigation into the best interests of a child, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.

               Bowling v. McCarrick; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-93885, 3 pages

The court’s goal is equity

               Although marital property need not be divided equally, it must be divided equitably in light of a court’s evaluation of the parties’ contributions, faults and needs, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.

               Elahham v. Al-Jabban; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-94159, 15 pages

Deference is owed to the parents’ decision

               Parents have a constitutionally protected right to raise their children as they see fit, therefore, if two fit parents both oppose visitation, their joint opposition effectively creates an irrebuttable presumption that denial of grandparenting time will not create a substantial risk of harm to the child, and the grandparents’ petition must be dismissed, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.

               Geering v. King; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-94926, 6 pages

All factors need not be stated on the record

               Consideration of every factor need not be stated on the record; however, before permitting a change in a minor child’s legal residence, the court shall consider each of the factors set forth under MCL 722.31(4), with the child as the primary focus in the court’s deliberations, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.

               Yachcik v. Yachcik; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-94107, 15 pages.

Probate Law

Attorney represents the conservator, not the estate

               An attorney hired to perform legal services for a conservator represents the conservator and does not have an attorney-client relationship with the estate, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.

               Estate of Tyler Jacob Maki v. Coen; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-93797, 7 pages

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!

Recent
Posts

Appeals Court Overturns Order To Euthanize Pit Bull
Jan 19, 2022
The Michigan Court of Appeals has reversed a trial court’s order to...
Ex-Michigan State Officials Cleared Of Criminal Charges Stemming From Nassar Case
Jan 12, 2022
The Michigan COA has cleared two former Michigan State University o...
Proposal Would Clarify Validity Of Arbitration Clauses In Attorney Retainer Agreements
Dec 28, 2021
The Michigan Supreme Court is considering an amendment to Michigan ...
Probate Court Properly Delayed Petitioner’s Payment Of Filing Fees
Dec 22, 2021
The petitioner in In re Guardianship and Conservatorship of Pobanz ...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required