Speaker Law Firm Wins Appeal for Two Fit Parents Wrongfully Subjected to Grandparenting Time Order | Speaker Law
phone icon email icon
(517) 482-8933

Speaker Law
Blog

Speaker Law Firm Wins Appeal for Two Fit Parents Wrongfully Subjected to Grandparenting Time Order

Posted on Thursday, May 17, 2018

The COA issued another published opinion in a grandparenting time case. Geering v Robinson, issued June 13, 2017 (Docket 335794). In that case, the parents had divorced. Although they struggled with some issues post-judgment of divorce, including litigation over parenting time and custody, they eventually resolved their differences and stipulated to a custody and parenting time order. In the meantime, the mother’s father (paternal grandfather) filed a motion for grandparenting time.  The parents submitted an affidavit opposing the grandparenting time. 

According to MCL 722.27b(5) provides that “If 2 fit parents sign an affidavit stating that they both oppose an order for grandparenting time, the court shall dismiss a complaint or motion seeking an order for grandparenting time….” (Emphasis added).  Here, the trial court put the parties through a fitness trial, concluded that the parents were unfit, and awarded grandparenting time.

The COA reversed the trial court’s decision, concluding that the trial court’s decision that the parents were unfit was against the great weight of the evidence.  Although the parents at one point had difficulty communicating with each other, were inconsistent in meting out discipline, were inconsistent in co-parenting, those difficulties had resolved themselves by the time the parents stipulated to parenting time and custody.  There was no evidence in this record that the parents were not adequately caring for their children (that is, there was no evidence they lacked fitness). The COA remanded for dismissal of the grandparenting time motion, as required by statute.

Do you have an appeal?
Let's find out!

Recent
Posts

Law Firm May Collect Unpaid Fees Based On Contract Provision
Nov 23, 2021
A trial court properly awarded the plaintiff-attorney more than $78...
Appeals Court Strikes Down Parts Of Michigan’s Ballot Drive Law
Nov 17, 2021
The Michigan Court of Appeals has declared unconstitutional several...
Statute Authorizing Imposition Of Court Costs Is Constitutional
Nov 10, 2021
The defendant did not demonstrate that MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(iii) – the ...
Plaintiff’s Fraud Did Not Necessitate ROPA Judgment Being Vacated
Nov 3, 2021
The trial court in this disputed parentage case properly held that,...

Tags

 

Subscribe to our blog

* indicates required