Since graduating from The University of Texas School of Law, one of the nation’s top law schools, Liisa Speaker has become well known for her excellent written and oral advocacy. Her appellate skills have helped clients obtain victories in appeals ranging from custody disputes to no-fault automobile insurance litigation to real property case and to probate appeals.
Liisa has represented clients in the federal appellate courts for the Fifth and Sixth Circuits as well as the appellate courts of Michigan and Texas. She has been recognized by her peers for her appellate advocacy, receiving the 2009 Distinguished Brief Award, presented by the Cooley Law Review from among the briefs submitted to Michigan Supreme Court in the prior year. The award honored her writing efforts for the amicus curiae brief she submitted in the USF&G v Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association case in the Michigan Supreme Court.
Liisa drafted and submitted amicus briefs on behalf of organizations such as the Family Law Section for the State Bar of Michigan, the Family Defense Attorneys of Michigan, the Appellate Practice Section for the State Bar of Michigan, the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault, and the Michigan Association for Justice. These briefs aided the Court in drafting opinions or orders that had profound impacts on the law in Allard v Allard, Estes v Titus; USF&G v MCCA, Rowland v Washtenaw County Road Commission, Beaver v Barton Malow, U of M Regents v Titan Insurance, and McCormick v Carrier, to name a few.
She has also obtained favorable rulings for her clients, resulting in published opinions. For example, in In re Keast she obtained a victory in a published opinion in the Michigan Court of Appeals in an adoption case which is now one of the most frequently cited cases in Adoption Law. In Rose v Rose, Ms. Speaker's efforts led to a published opinion addressing whether a party who waived his right to modification of spousal support can obtain relief from judgment. In Glaubius v Glaubius, the Court of Appeals held that a couple's divorce judgement did not bar the mother from later seeking a revocation of her ex-husband's paternity. She has achieved great success in obtaining the rarely-granted peremptory reversals for clients in the Michigan Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. In Romans v Michigan DHS she obtained a reversal from 6th Circuit of trial court's grant of summary judgment on an employee's Family Medical Leave Act claim.
In addition to a demonstrated history of effective appellate advocacy, Ms. Speaker is highly involved in the legal community. She was appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court to two four-year terms on the Court Reporter and Recorder Board of Review. She is a past chair of the Appellate Practice Section for the State Bar of Michigan. She is also Past President to the Ingham County Bar Association. Through her written and oral advocacy, Ms. Speaker has demonstrated a passion for developing an appellate practice that gives her clients a voice, while contributing to the legal community. Liisa lives in Lansing with her husband, two daughters, Great Dane and a cat.
In re AGD, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2019).
In re Blakeman, Minors, __ Mich App ___; __ NW2d ___ (2018).
In re MJG, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
In re JSP, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
In re BGP, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
Geering v Geering, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
Elaham v Al Jabban, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
Allard v Allard, Opinion on Remand, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017) (Amicus curiae).
Lamis Elahham v Mohamad Al Jabban, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
John A Lieberman v Kimberly A Lieberman (Orr), ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
Stephani L Wallen v Kristopher J Yachcik, ___ Mich App ___; NW2d ___ (2017).
Estate of Tyler Maki v Victor Coen, ___ Mich App ___; ___NW2d ___ (2017).
Jennifer Bowling v Bradly McCarrick, ___ Mich App ___; ___NW2d ___ (2017).\
Sheet Metal Employers Industry Promotion Fund v Absolut Balancing Co., ___ F.3d ___ (6th 2016)
In re Deng, Minors, 314 Mich App 615; 887 NW2d 445 (2016).
Madson v Jaso, ___ Mich ___ ; ___ NW2d___ (2016).
In re Bittner, 312 Mich App 227; 879 NW2d 269 (2015).
Maier v Maier, 211 Mich App 218; 874 NW2d 725 (2015).
Richards v Richards, 310 Mich App 683; 874 NW2d 704 (2015).
Hunter v Sisco, 497 Mich 45; 860 NW2d 67 (2014) (Amicus curiae).
Glaubius v Glaubius, 306 Mich App 157; 855 NW2d 221 (2014).
Mercantile Bank Mortgage Company LLC v NCPCP/BRYS Centre LLC, 305 Mich App 215;
852 NW2d 210 (2014) (Oral Argument Only).
W.H. Bearce Trust v Estate of Rosemary Futrell, 303 Mich App 28; 840 NW2d 775 (2013).
Burris v Kam Transport Inc, 301 Mich App 482; 836 NW2d 727 (2013).
Berrien v United States, 711 F.3d 654 (6th Cir 2013 [Mich.]).
Romans v Michigan Department of Human Services, 668 F3d 826 (6th Cir. 2012 [Mich.]).
People v Gomez, 295 Mich App 411; 820 NW2d 217 (2012).
Joseph v Auto Club Ins Ass’n, 491 Mich 200; 815 NW2d 412 (2012) (Amicus curiae).
Augustine v Allstate (After Remand), 292 Mich App 408; 807 NW2d 77 (2011).
Krohn v Home-Owners Ins Co, 490 Mich 145; 801 NW2d 281 (2011) (Amicus curiae).
University of Michigan Regents v Titan Insurance Co, 487 Mich 289; 791 NW2d 897 (2010) (Amicus curiae).
McCormick v Carrier, 478 Mich 180; 770 NW2d 359 (2010) (Amicus curiae).
Rose v Rose, 289 Mich App 45; 795 NW2d 611 (2010).
United States Fidelity Ins & Guar Co v Mich Catastrophic Claims Ass’n, 484 Mich 1; 773 NW2d 243 (2009).
Estes v Titus, 481 Mich 573; 751 NW2d 493 (2008) (Amicus curiae).
In the Matter of Alyssa and Amber Keast, Minors, 278 Mich App 415; 750 NW2d 643 (2008).
In the Matter of Steven Zimmerman, Minor, 277 Mich App 470; 746 NW2d 306 (2008), rev’d in part 48
Mich 1143 (2008).
Mackinac Chapter of Sierra Club v. Michigan DEQ, 277 Mich App 531; 747 NW2d321 (2008).
Rowland v Washtenaw County Rd Comm’n, 477 Mich 197; 731 NW2d 41 (2007) (Amicus curiae).
United States v. Stuart, 507 F.3d 391(6th Cir. 2007 [Mich.]).
Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co., 342 F.3d 569 (5th Cir. 2003 [Tex.]).