Purported ‘Clarification’ Of Divorce Judgment Vacated Because Trial Court ‘Changed’ Its Prior Ruling
The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled the Oakland County trial court improperly granted an ex-husband’s motion to “clarify” the parties’ judgment of divorce because, in doing so, the trial court actually modified the judgment, thereby affecting the parties’ substantive rights.
Threshold Questions Not Addressed, Custody Case Wrongly Referred To FOC
The trial court erroneously referred this custody case to the Friend of the Court without first determining whether there was proper cause or a change in circumstances that necessitated a review of custody and parenting time, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.